- Published on
Day 5: Starting Distribution Right Away (2026)
- Authors

- Name
- Rakesh Tembhurne
- @tembhurnerakesh
The Lesson That Made Me Act
Four days of reading the same pattern across hundreds of revenue threads, builder posts, and failure reports. The finding was consistent and unambiguous: distribution beats features, every time.
It does not matter how good the product is if nobody knows it exists. Shipping code to nobody is not a business — it is a hobby.
I spent Days 1 through 4 analyzing, scoring, and mapping. That was useful. But analysis without distribution is a private exercise. The research does not matter if nobody reads it.
So on Day 5, I stopped analyzing and started distributing.
The Email Service Rabbit Hole
Before landing on Substack, I went down the obvious path: build my own email service.
How hard could it be? Set up an SMTP server, write some templates, collect subscribers, send emails. I started researching the options.
Amazon SES — cheap per email, but the infrastructure cost adds up. You need to manage your own sender reputation, handle bounces, set up DKIM and SPF records, deal with spam complaints. For a solo builder, the operational overhead is enormous.
Mailgun, SendGrid, Postmark — better UX than SES, but still require you to build the sending infrastructure, manage lists, handle unsubscribes, and most importantly, build the audience yourself. The tool sends emails. It does not find readers.
Self-hosted options — Cost of server, deliverability issues, IP warming, blacklist management. The technical challenge is solvable. The deliverability challenge is not — getting emails into inboxes, not spam folders, is a full-time job.
The pattern was clear: reaching people is expensive. Not just in money, but in time, infrastructure, and ongoing maintenance. Building the email engine is a project in itself. And it does not solve the real problem — having nobody to email.
Why Substack Won
After the research, the decision was obvious. Substack solves the two problems I actually have:
Reach. Substack has millions of readers. The recommendation engine, the Notes feature, and the built-in discovery mean I do not need to build an audience from scratch — I need to show up in front of the one that already exists. The platform does the distribution work that would take me months to replicate.
Zero setup cost. Free to start. No hosting, no SMTP configuration, no sender reputation to build. The friction between "I should start a newsletter" and "I have a newsletter" is zero.
The other options — SES, Mailgun, self-hosted — make sense when you already have 10,000 subscribers and want to cut costs. They do not make sense when you have zero subscribers and need to find the first 100.
The better solution is to use the platform. Build the audience there. Move later if the economics demand it.
The JCI Connection
Here is the part I had not thought about until Day 5.
I have an email list. Not from a lead magnet or a landing page — from four years in JCI (Junior Chambers International). Colleagues, chapter members, people I worked with on projects and events. These are real people, not cold leads. They know me. They know the work.
The problem was: what do I email them? A generic "hey, I am building things" newsletter is not compelling. People do not subscribe to randomness. They subscribe to relevance.
That is where jcialumni.org fits in. I already have the directory — minimal, but live. If I build something around JCI — a better directory, networking tools, chapter resources, event listings — I have something relevant to email about. The JCI alumni get value. The newsletter gets subscribers. The project gets users.
The flow is simple:
- Build something useful for JCI — improve the directory, add features, create content around the JCI experience
- Email the JCI network — not cold outreach, but genuine updates about a tool they can use
- Convert readers to subscribers — people who care about JCI will stay for the content
- Expand from there — the audience that stays for JCI content will also be interested in the building-in-public journey
The JCI network is the first 100 subscribers. Not because I am marketing to them, but because I am building something they actually need.
What This Means for the Other Projects
Distribution is not a separate activity. It feeds everything else.
- KhabarOnline — the lessons from running AI auto-publishing become content that attracts the audience who would pay for that tool.
- Trigyaa — the AI automation experiments on the e-commerce store become case studies that build credibility.
- TrueValueEstate — the market validation stories, the customer conversations, the pivots — all of it becomes content.
- JCI Alumni — becomes the first focused content vertical. Build, document, email, repeat.
The blog and the Substack feed each other. Long-form here, summaries there. Cross-promotion without duplication.
What Happens Next
The Substack is live. The first article is up. The JCI email list is waiting.
Day 6 and beyond: improve the JCI directory, write the first JCI-focused piece for the Substack, start reaching out to the network. Ship a feature on one of the live projects. Document it. Keep the cycle going.
The research phase is over. The distribution phase has started.
Day 5 is shipped.
Related Posts
Day 4: Mapping Ideas to Market Demand (2026)
I have six live projects and a few concepts. The problem is not having ideas — it is figuring out which ones deserve more time and which ones need to evolve. Here is how I am mapping what I have built against what the market actually pays for.
Day 3: Three Categories to Build On (2026)
After two days of research, the conclusion is clear: focus on Build Fast, Ship Fast, and Teach Fast. Here is why these three categories capture the real money in AI.
Day 2: Choosing Ideas to Build (2026)
Day 2 of the build-in-public series. The framework I am using to pick what to build next, filtered through Day 1 lessons on distribution, niche, moats, and what indie builders actually ship for $10–$99/mo.